Difference between revisions of "User Interface Evaluation/Short Item View"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (cat) |
m (minor change in category) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 15:18, 9 January 2008 (CET) | [[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 15:18, 9 January 2008 (CET) | ||
[[Category:Analysis & Evaluation]] | [[Category:Analysis & Evaluation|Short Item View]] | ||
[[Category:User Interface Engineering]] | [[Category:User Interface Engineering]] |
Revision as of 09:38, 8 January 2009
Short Item View[edit]
Place: | MPDL Amalienstraße |
Date: | 29.11.2007 |
Status: | Closed |
Summary of Workshop Results[edit]
Initially the workshop for the short list view was not ment to deliver very much valid results, but when I put the pages from the whiteboard some things were striking. So I counted them for you:
- Creators are mostly on the first position (18/23 Participants)
- Title is mostly used as the second field (15/23 Participants)
- File/Fulltext seems to have an outstanding position because it was placed differently on exposed positions or apart from the list (down, right, top)
- Most participants prefer a vertical alignment of labels and fields (16/23)
Some participants tried to do a more sophisticated layout - which might mean that they do not like monotonous listings (just guessing). Thanks for participating!
Rupert 15:18, 9 January 2008 (CET)