Difference between revisions of "User Interface Evaluation"
(edited by Rkiefl via TableEdit) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
!bgcolor = #eee |Participants | !bgcolor = #eee |Participants | ||
| | | | ||
5 - 8 | |||
|- | |- | ||
!bgcolor = #eee |Supervisor | !bgcolor = #eee |Supervisor | ||
| | | | ||
1 | 1 - 2 | ||
|- | |- | ||
!bgcolor = #eee |Equipment | !bgcolor = #eee |Equipment | ||
| | | | ||
Equipment provided by UIE Team | |||
|- | |- | ||
!bgcolor = #eee |Duration | !bgcolor = #eee |Duration | ||
| | | | ||
4h - 6h | |||
|- | |- | ||
!bgcolor = #eee |Result | !bgcolor = #eee |Result | ||
| | | | ||
A rough draft of a graphical user interface part. | |||
|- | |||
!bgcolor = #eee |Steps | |||
| | |||
<ol> | |||
<li>Introduction to a GUI task</li> | |||
<li>Participants work on paper prototypes</li> | |||
<li>Question and Answers</li> | |||
<li>Comparison of Results</li> | |||
<li>Clustering</li> | |||
<li>Rework if necessary</li> | |||
<li>Preparation and dissamination of results</li> | |||
</ol> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=' | |colspan='7'|[{{SERVER}}/mediawiki/index.php/Special:TableEdit?id=9d918c381310dd472203b251d1a85892.830.1199881210&page=830&pagename={{FULLPAGENAMEE}} edit table] | ||
|} | |} | ||
<!--box uid=9d918c381310dd472203b251d1a85892.830.1199881210--> | <!--box uid=9d918c381310dd472203b251d1a85892.830.1199881210--> |
Revision as of 12:41, 9 January 2008
|
Interfaces, built at the MPDL are subject to evaluation. Main focus are all interfaces of the current PubMan solution. Evaluation of the User Interface Engineering team has different approaches: Usability Interviews and tests, GUI Workshops and software based evaluation.
Usability Interviews[edit]
Setting:
Participants |
5 - 8 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supervisor |
1 - 2 | |||||
Equipment |
Equipment provided by UIE Team | |||||
Duration |
4h - 6h | |||||
Result |
A rough draft of a graphical user interface part. | |||||
Steps |
| |||||
edit table |
Participants:1 Supervisor: 1 Duration: ~1h Equipment:
Workshops[edit]
Participants |
1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supervisor |
1 | ||||
Equipment |
| ||||
Duration |
Depends on workflow and performance: 30min - 1h | ||||
Result | |||||
edit table |
Initially the workshop for the short list view was not ment to deliver very much valid results, but when I put the pages from the whiteboard some things were striking. So I counted them for you:
1. Creators are mostly on the first position (18/23 Participants) 2. Title is mostly used as the second field (15/23 Participants) 2. File/Fulltext seems to have an outstanding position because it was placed differently on exposed positions or apart from the list (down, right, top) 3. Most participants prefer a vertical alignment of labels and fields (16/23)
Some participants tried to do a more sophisticated layout - which might mean that they do not like monotonous listings (just guessing).
Software based Evaluation[edit]
TBD