Difference between revisions of "Talk:Springer Open Choice Data Transfer"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
* assign priorities within the team
* assign priorities within the team
* communicate results to MPG libraries, invite them for comments
* communicate results to MPG libraries, invite them for comments
== Recherche nach MPG-Publikationen bei Springer 2008 ==
'''search string'''
((max pla???k not (max pla???k str or max pla???k ring or (max pla???k and Geesthacht)))
or max pla???k inst or mpi or mpie or mpg or (fritz haber and berlin) or (ipp and garching)
or (miescher and tu?bingen) or (bonho??fer and go??tingen) or kerckhoff inst$ or
(Hertziana and Rome) or (kunst$ and florenz$)).in.
[http://ovid.gwdg.de/ovid-bin/login.cgi?T=JS&D=ccall&MODE=ovid&PAGE=main&SEARCH=%28%28max+pla%3F%3F%3Fk+not+%28max+pla%3F%3F%3Fk+str+or+max+pla%3F%3F%3Fk+ring+or+%28max+pla%3F%3F%3Fk+and+Geesthacht%29%29%29+or+max+pla%3F%3F%3Fk+inst+or+mpi+or+mpie+or+mpg+or+%28fritz+haber+and+berlin%29+or+%28ipp+and+garching%29+or+%28miescher+and+tu%3Fbingen%29+or+%28bonho%3F%3Ffer+and+go%3F%3Ftingen%29+or+kerckhoff+inst%24+or+%28Hertziana+and+Rome%29+or+%28kunst%24+and+florenz%24%29%29%2Ein%2E search for MPG institutions in Current Contents (Ovid)]
and "2008".yr.
and springer.pu.

Revision as of 15:14, 13 May 2009

Overview of 1. Workflow variante, before revision in March 2009[edit]

Springer

  • after acceptance process: corresponding author tags that paper any creator is affiliated with MPG
    Note: Currently, this information is not checked automatically (e.g. by comparing the author's affiliation with the selection), therefore MPG articles could be missing or external articles could be mapped incorrectly
  • publication gets processed, e.g. metadata is created, pdf is generated
  • Springer's data delivery service (dds) runs an export job on a regular base and makes the information available to MPG

MPG
needs to be defined and should specify following actions and the corresponding responsibilities

  • download data
  • check for plausibility and correctness
    How to create "nachforderungen" an springer? (only manually, maybe once a year)
  • download from Springer ftp server
  • upload to subversion repository (e.g https://dev.livingreviews.org/repos/mdbase)
    The repository is checked out daily to a web server which is access restricted to the MPG IP range (see http://srvd.livingreviews.org/mdbase/trunk/springer_openchoice), thus the original data would become available to other interested users in MPG.
  • upload to edoc:
    • transforming Springer data into internal format
    • upload into one Open Choice Collection
    • merging existing records with springer data - won't be done automatically
  • notification of MPG librarians, including
    • list of journals
    • list of affiliations
    • list of authors
    • should be further checked with librarians

Open Issues:

  • negotiate requirements regarding data delivery (issued material only, monthly processing) with springer - Done. Results as follows:
    • issued material only; monthly processed; every month delivery of the new material, only; no additional cumulative file.
  • plan extensions required for edoc (copy with full text, tag copied items, define metadata mapping)
  • assign priorities within the team
  • communicate results to MPG libraries, invite them for comments