Difference between revisions of "User Interface Evaluation/Thinking Aloud/Interview Analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→References) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The test documents containing all relevant tasks and notes from the interviews can be found here: | The test documents containing all relevant tasks and notes from the interviews can be found here: | ||
[https:// | [https://subversion.mpdl.mpg.de/repos/smc/trunk/04_Design/03_GUI_Design/04_Usability_Evaluation/ Interviews/SVN] | ||
=Summary= | =Summary= | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
[[Category:User Interface | [[Category: User Interface Engineering]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:21, 25 April 2012
| APPLICATION AREAS |
|---|
|
|
| PROJECTS |
|
Research- and Metadata Handling Corporate & Interface Design (under Rework) |
| edit |
Results from 'Thinking Aloud' interviews based on R2[edit]
The usability evaluation method 'think aloud'[1] is the most affordable and efficient among numerous test methods. If one follows human centred design principles to go for ISO 13407[2], it is good way to get relevant issues fast.
11 Persons were interviewed out of 3 domains:
- Scientists (5 Interviews)
- Librarians (4 Interviews)
- Secretaries (2 Interviews)
This is the first result across three person groups. To get a closer picture for one group at least 7 Interviews need to be taken.
Diagram
The test documents containing all relevant tasks and notes from the interviews can be found here:
Summary[edit]
The following issues are identified
- Screen jumps on every action to top -> Technical Issue
- Procedure/Wording 'Language' -> Technical/Functional Issue
- Position 'Form buttons' -> GUI Issue
- Procedure 'Add button' -> GUI Issue
- Procedure 'File upload and 'add'/'browse' -> GUI Issue
- Procedure 'Organizations'/'Advanced Search' -> GUI Issue
- Procedure 'Select Mechanism' -> GUI Issue