Difference between revisions of "User Interface Evaluation/Short Item View"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (minor change in category) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:TemplateUIE_Activities}} | |||
<div style="float:left; width:70%; margin-bottom:3em;"> | |||
==Short Item View== | ==Short Item View== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 28: | ||
[[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 15:18, 9 January 2008 (CET) | [[User:Rkiefl|Rupert]] 15:18, 9 January 2008 (CET) | ||
</div> | |||
[[Category:Analysis & Evaluation|Short Item View]] | [[Category:Analysis & Evaluation|Short Item View]] | ||
[[Category:User Interface Engineering]] | [[Category:User Interface Engineering]] | ||
Revision as of 08:06, 16 June 2009
| APPLICATION AREAS |
|---|
|
|
| PROJECTS |
|
Research- and Metadata Handling Corporate & Interface Design (under Rework) |
| edit |
Short Item View[edit]
| Place: | MPDL Amalienstraße |
| Date: | 29.11.2007 |
| Status: | Closed |
Summary of Workshop Results[edit]
Initially the workshop for the short list view was not ment to deliver very much valid results, but when I put the pages from the whiteboard some things were striking. So I counted them for you:
- Creators are mostly on the first position (18/23 Participants)
- Title is mostly used as the second field (15/23 Participants)
- File/Fulltext seems to have an outstanding position because it was placed differently on exposed positions or apart from the list (down, right, top)
- Most participants prefer a vertical alignment of labels and fields (16/23)
Some participants tried to do a more sophisticated layout - which might mean that they do not like monotonous listings (just guessing). Thanks for participating!
Rupert 15:18, 9 January 2008 (CET)