Difference between revisions of "ViRR Specification"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 44: Line 44:
= SECOND PHASE =
= SECOND PHASE =


=== Workflow ===


=== User Management ===
incl. visibility and privileges
* User roles
** Unregistered user (full viewing rights)
** Account user (full viewing rights and the right to make proposals for the content of the descriptive metadata, keywords and synonyms)
** Local administrator (full viewing and editing rights for all metadata, competence to accept or refuse the proposals of the account users)
*User management workspace (only visible and editable for local administrators)
** All information about the account users will be stored in the system: new users can be added, still available users can be edited or deactivated (not deleted).
=== Transcriptions ===
in METS
* A transcription of all pages is desirable. Perhaps an OCR method can be integrated, which has to be corrected manually.
* A tool for the online creation of transcriptions is needed with further functionalities:
** Automatic display of "who has done what"
** Connection with the workflow: every user should be able to create or update a transcription, but the changes will only be released when they are authorized by a legitimate person.
* Heidelberg will deliver several transcriptions of the texts which can be integrated in ViRR. There, the scientists shall have the possibility to rework them.
*: ViRR shall support to annotate external objects (like the transcriptions from Heidelberg), without saving the object directly in ViRR (redundant data storage is not desirable).
*: This can only work, when the users of ViRR have the privileges to change the external objects.
=== Ingestion ===
* Uploading of further books via a batch method (together with bibliographic metadata, evtl. also with transcriptions)
=== Editing ===
* Editing of bibliographic and descriptive metadata (for the whole book or only a part of it)
=== Annotations ===
(zu Editing)
* What should be annotated (only the transcriptions or something else)?
* What markup is needed for that annotation?
=== Relations ===
* Relations between one word and a dictionary
* Relations between items
=== Synonyms ===
# Creation of a synonym list
#* A synonym list can be based on the keyword list
# Assignment of synonyms
#* During the editing of metadata it should be possible to specify new synonyms which then should be automatically added to the synonym list.
#* If one synonym is not valid for the whole term of a metadata field, it should be possible to mark the part of the term (e.g. for "Die ''Polizeiordnungen'' des heiligen römischen Reiches" one synonym is "Polizeyordnungen").
=== Open Points ===
# '''User Management'''
#* Are further roles are needed (e.g. librarian, scientist)? With what privileges?
# '''Synonyms'''
#* Shall the synonyms be integrated in the index list?




[[Category:Virtueller Raum Reichsrecht]]
[[Category:Virtueller Raum Reichsrecht]]

Revision as of 09:19, 13 February 2008

eSciDoc Solutions

PubMan:
Overview · Functionalities
Interfaces · Support

Faces:
Overview · Functionalities
Scope · Support

ViRR:
Overview · Functionalities
Scope · Support

imeji
Digitization Lifecycle

edit

This is a protected page.

Restricted Access

in progress

The start content (the images) are available as tiff, pdf and jpg. The tiffs (up to 50 MB per picture) are the original archive version, the pdfs are needed for the download and the jpgs for the web presentation.

Detailed Specification about the different scenarios can be found here:


FIRST PHASE[edit]

Release one[edit]

Open Points[edit]

  1. Bibliographic Metadata
    • A list of all MABs fields used by the institute is necessary to prepare the mapping.
  2. Quality correction of the pictures
    • The institute is not pleased with the quality of the original TIFFs (e.g. the black frames of the scans should be removed) and also with the created jpgs. The MPDL can only offer an automatic refinement of the presentation of the pictures (jpgs), not of the original files. If a correction of the original files is needed, this has to be done manually by the institute.

Release two[edit]

Open Points[edit]

  1. Descriptive Metadata
    • A list of all metadata that should be marked up is needed from the institute.

Release three[edit]

Release four[edit]

SECOND PHASE[edit]