Difference between revisions of "Faces Content Models"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Note: this content model is applicable for R2 of Faces solution and there may be changes in future depending on R3 requirements | *Note: this content model is applicable for R2 of Faces solution and there may be changes in future depending on R3 requirements | ||
==Context== | ==Context== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
===Face collections=== | ===Face collections=== | ||
*'''ContainerCModel:''' FaceCollection | *'''ContainerCModel:''' FaceCollection | ||
*'''Metadata:''' | *'''Metadata:''' [[Faces_Application_Profile_Collection|Faces Application Profile Collection]] | ||
: We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the | |||
: We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the here? --[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Done, as it is the current state. --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 08:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Members:''' All face items | *'''Members:''' All face items | ||
| Line 37: | Line 39: | ||
===User albums=== | ===User albums=== | ||
*'''ContainerCModel''': FaceAlbum | *'''ContainerCModel''': FaceAlbum | ||
*'''Metadata''': | *'''Metadata''': [[Faces_Application_Profile_Album|Faces Application Profile Album]] | ||
: We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the [[Faces_Application_Profile_Album|Faces Application Profile Album]] here? --[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | : We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the [[Faces_Application_Profile_Album|Faces Application Profile Album]] here? --[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Done, as it is the current state. However would still consider having Face Album and Faces Collection as a single profile. --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 08:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Members''': selected face items by the user | *'''Members''': selected face items by the user | ||
==Items== | ==Items== | ||
*'''ItemCModel:''' FaceItem | *'''ItemCModel:''' FaceItem | ||
*'''Metadata:''' | *'''Metadata:''' [[Faces_Application_Profile_FacesItem|Faces Application Profile FacesItem]] | ||
: We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the [[Faces_Application_Profile_FacesItem|Faces Application Profile FacesItem]] here? --[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | : We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the [[Faces_Application_Profile_FacesItem|Faces Application Profile FacesItem]] here? --[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::This was realy copy/paste mistake. Sure Face Items have separate profile. --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 08:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
*'''Conditions:''' | *'''Conditions:''' | ||
**Component has public or private visibility | **Component has public or private visibility | ||
Revision as of 08:37, 25 August 2008
|
Content model for FACES collection[edit]
- Note: this content model is applicable for R2 of Faces solution and there may be changes in future depending on R3 requirements
Context[edit]
- Context: FaceContext
- Admin descriptor: No rules for now
- Workflow: No rules for now
- Validation rules: No rules for now
- Responsible org units: MPIB
Proposal[edit]
- Have extra context for Album creators simply to distinguish them and not to mix - Thus album creators would be able to give further privileges for their albums to other people, check also discussion on
See Discussion page on user management
Containers[edit]
Face collections[edit]
- ContainerCModel: FaceCollection
- Metadata: Faces Application Profile Collection
- We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the here? --Kristina 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Done, as it is the current state. --Natasa 08:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Members: All face items
Proposal[edit]
Instead above create 2 objects with FaceCollection CModel.
- 1. object: Faces collection
- Members: all face items
- 2. object: Faces public collection
- Members: face items with public component level visibility
Both containers would be top level containers in Faces Context.
- Proposal: to postpone the creation of two separate containers for now until R3 and further requirements. probably we should come back to it later.--Natasa 00:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
User albums[edit]
- ContainerCModel: FaceAlbum
- Metadata: Faces Application Profile Album
- We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the Faces Application Profile Album here? --Kristina 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Done, as it is the current state. However would still consider having Face Album and Faces Collection as a single profile. --Natasa 08:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Members: selected face items by the user
Items[edit]
- ItemCModel: FaceItem
- Metadata: Faces Application Profile FacesItem
- We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the Faces Application Profile FacesItem here? --Kristina 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- This was realy copy/paste mistake. Sure Face Items have separate profile. --Natasa 08:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Conditions:
- Component has public or private visibility