Difference between revisions of "Faces Content Models"

From MPDLMediaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (Christina remarks taken into consideration. Page reworked.)
Line 22: Line 22:
*'''ContainerCModel:''' FaceCollection
*'''ContainerCModel:''' FaceCollection
*'''Metadata:'''  [[Faces_Application_Profile_Collection|Faces Application Profile Collection]]
*'''Metadata:'''  [[Faces_Application_Profile_Collection|Faces Application Profile Collection]]
: We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the  here? --[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
::Done, as it is the current state. --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 08:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Members:''' All face items
*'''Members:''' All face items


Line 40: Line 37:
*'''ContainerCModel''': FaceAlbum
*'''ContainerCModel''': FaceAlbum
*'''Metadata''': [[Faces_Application_Profile_Album|Faces Application Profile Album]]
*'''Metadata''': [[Faces_Application_Profile_Album|Faces Application Profile Album]]
: We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the [[Faces_Application_Profile_Album|Faces Application Profile Album]] here? --[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
::Done, as it is the current state. However would still consider having Face Album and Faces Collection as a single profile. --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 08:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Members''': selected face items by the user
*'''Members''': selected face items by the user


Line 47: Line 42:
*'''ItemCModel:''' FaceItem
*'''ItemCModel:''' FaceItem
*'''Metadata:''' [[Faces_Application_Profile_FacesItem|Faces Application Profile FacesItem]]
*'''Metadata:''' [[Faces_Application_Profile_FacesItem|Faces Application Profile FacesItem]]
: We have separate APs for Faces. Why not mention the [[Faces_Application_Profile_FacesItem|Faces Application Profile FacesItem]] here? --[[User:Kristina|Kristina]] 07:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
::This was realy copy/paste mistake. Sure Face Items have separate profile. --[[User:Natasab|Natasa]] 08:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
*'''Conditions:'''  
*'''Conditions:'''  
**Component has public or private visibility
**Component has public or private visibility

Revision as of 08:38, 25 August 2008

eSciDoc Solutions

PubMan:
Overview · Functionalities
Interfaces · Support

Faces:
Overview · Functionalities
Scope · Support

ViRR:
Overview · Functionalities
Scope · Support

imeji
Digitization Lifecycle

edit


Content model for FACES collection[edit]

  • Note: this content model is applicable for R2 of Faces solution and there may be changes in future depending on R3 requirements


Context[edit]

  • Context: FaceContext
    • Admin descriptor: No rules for now
    • Workflow: No rules for now
    • Validation rules: No rules for now
    • Responsible org units: MPIB

Proposal[edit]

  • Have extra context for Album creators simply to distinguish them and not to mix - Thus album creators would be able to give further privileges for their albums to other people, check also discussion on

See Discussion page on user management

Containers[edit]

Face collections[edit]

Proposal[edit]

Instead above create 2 objects with FaceCollection CModel.

  • 1. object: Faces collection
    • Members: all face items
  • 2. object: Faces public collection
    • Members: face items with public component level visibility

Both containers would be top level containers in Faces Context.

Proposal: to postpone the creation of two separate containers for now until R3 and further requirements. probably we should come back to it later.--Natasa 00:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

User albums[edit]

Items[edit]